Steam Group
Google Plus
Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.



Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5,001
» Latest member: williambrown
» Forum threads: 4,958
» Forum posts: 36,495

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 50 online users.
» 6 Member(s) | 44 Guest(s)
deucedemon22, Dogesky, SaintLuther, 卐Demonik1卐

Latest Threads
Bomb Defuse Idea
Forum: Server Suggestions
Last Post: SaintLuther
24 minutes ago
» Replies: 13
» Views: 76
NFPA Codes, Standards, an...
Forum: General Chat
Last Post: M-E-T-A
43 minutes ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 104
Remove WAC
Forum: Server Suggestions
Last Post: TrueCrimson
44 minutes ago
» Replies: 29
» Views: 692
rip lil peep
Forum: Leave of Absence
Last Post: deucedemon22
59 minutes ago
» Replies: 11
» Views: 127
PLEASE! Don't let this LF...
Forum: Server Chat
Last Post: SaintLuther
1 hour ago
» Replies: 9
» Views: 95
Pac3 Suggestions
Forum: General Chat
Last Post: williambrown
2 hours ago
» Replies: 11
» Views: 412
MC Diamond Sword
Forum: Server Suggestions
Last Post: SaintLuther
3 hours ago
» Replies: 6
» Views: 287
Ban Time: Increased for A...
Forum: Server Suggestions
Last Post: SaintLuther
3 hours ago
» Replies: 5
» Views: 150
UHC's admin application
Forum: Apply for Staff
Last Post: 13th TimeLord
8 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 25
Regarding TTT's Mass RDM ...
Forum: Server Suggestions
Last Post: DarudeDankstorm
8 hours ago
» Replies: 7
» Views: 97

  Bomb Defuse Idea
Posted by: TrueCrimson - 8 hours ago - Forum: Server Suggestions - Replies (13)

So we all know bomb defuse is very difficult to win as the T so I have come up with an idea to make it a bit more fair. We had a 3rd bomb cite or maybe 2 more to every map which I will get for Saint. This will spread people out way more making it easier for the T's to plant the bomb. Now because you can hide the bomb so the inno have a harder I think once planted the other 2 bomb cites should disappear or the chat should announce where the bomb is located so people are not scrambling at 3 or 4 cites looking for a hidden bomb. I think this will make it a bit more fair for the T's so people are not upset if they get that role. Again Saint can adjust this or get final say but I have agreed to do it so there is no obligation on the TTT community to do this.

If you are not a normal TTT player and do not know what bomb defuse it please do not spam the thread with bs and just ask if you would like to know.

Print this item

  UHC's admin application
Posted by: UHC - Today, 07:47 AM - Forum: Apply for Staff - Replies (1)

Server I want to be an admin on: LFG Sandbox

Why I should be an admin: I can be active on the servers for more than once a day and can keep helping new players.

Previous admin experience: I don't have any other experience

Do I agree with the rules stated in the rules forum? Yes I do.

Print this item

Rainbow rip lil peep
Posted by: Disco - Today, 02:11 AM - Forum: Leave of Absence - Replies (11)

[Image: 3d9cYzj.png]

cya fuckers

Print this item

  PLEASE! Don't let this LFG Tradition die!
Posted by: Manlord - Today, 01:33 AM - Forum: Server Chat - Replies (9)

So last year when ever there would be a holiday, a bunch of members would put something related to the holiday in front of their name. (I.e. HalloweenBoomer, Thanksgiving Manlord, ChristmasCalico) Guys I encourage you to keep the tradition going! Please It's only for about 2 weeks! Do something with Thanksgiving!!!

(Put the name your using below)

I'm using Thanksgiving Manlord

Print this item

  NFPA Codes, Standards, and Guidelines Seminar
Posted by: 『TXM』Xenon - Yesterday, 10:56 PM - Forum: General Chat - Replies (2)

I will be leading an NFPA seminar on Sandbox sometime within the following month, I need help deciding what to talk about. I want you guys to pick what you think is most important for people to know and could be useful during everyday situations and emergencies. The format the replies are to be posted in:

Code/Standard: <>

Summary: <>

Why I think this should be discussed: <>

[spoiler=List of NFPA Codes and Standards]

Please remember that this is a serious thread, so try not to spam and take discussions and arguments elsewhere.

Print this item

Rainbow Jukebox
Posted by: M-E-T-A - Yesterday, 09:39 PM - Forum: Server Suggestions - Replies (2)

We should add a jukebox so you can play songs for a certain amount of LFG points.
I know it cost papa saint but it is cool and you can make it so only donators get to use it or something like that.
Here is script
Here is content for it

[spoiler]We should also add change our error signs to[/spoiler]

Print this item

  Regarding TTT's Mass RDM rules
Posted by: DarudeDankstorm - Yesterday, 09:14 PM - Forum: Server Suggestions - Replies (7)

Something happened a while back that I was considering posting about a while back, and I finally got around to it. I think that we should make a slight exception to the Mass RDM bans. While most people intentionally RDM, I've seen a few cases of complete accidents. For example, a while back, a T threw a holy hand grenade (he didn't know what it did) and managed to kill 3 other Ts. I want to make a change to the rules. Something like:

If a player Mass RDMs in a single round, using a single attack, and their intentions were clearly not malicious (up to the staff online), the accused played would serve out 6 autoslays or a day ban in place of a week ban. 

I feel like this protects the rare occasion of players taking out teammates accidentally. Now of course, this doesn't apply to RDM over time or clear intent to RDM.

Print this item

Lightbulb Ban Time: Increased for Admins
Posted by: ajphandalf - Yesterday, 04:14 PM - Forum: Server Suggestions - Replies (5)

Hi all,

My suggestion is to increase the ban time that Admins can give to people. In particular perma bans, if not, up to a month or more bans. Most of the players that pick up 7 day bans (maximum penalty) are because they have, or attempted, to crash the server. The rest of the 7 day bans (maximum penalty) are for violating very strict rules regarding PAC and E2 abuses that heavily affect the playing experience on the server in-line with going as far as purposefully crashing the server. Especially on Sandbox.

That being said, I don't disagree with any of the rules, or current ban system in place as I feel they are already very fair which is why I elected to be part of this community to begin with. I just feel that 7 days is just a slap on the wrist while most other servers perma ban people for such offences. 

Could a perma/lengthy bans be abused? Certainly, but abusive individuals shouldn't be admins and we have a much better set of staff (that are more professional) over many other servers that have low level moderators that perma ban without warnings or kicks for the smallest thing. However, even those that were banned wrongfully, or otherwise, have the opportunity to appeal a ban right here in the forums. If getting to the forums is another argument against a lengthy ban for egregious offences admins could easily be required to add "Please visit if you wish to appeal this ban" to the reason. Also, for the most part LFG is indexed and optimized correctly to come up first on a simple Google search. Which is also easy to find considering the title of the servers start with "Lenny Face Gaming." 

Perhaps this can be very easily accomplished by just adding an additional admin rank to promote well seasoned, strict rule following, friendly and helpful admins to. It could be called "Senior Admin" or as simple as "Admin+" to limit controls of inexperienced admins. 

My primary focus has been eradicating cancer from the community and dispensing of admins that are mediocre, or otherwise abusive. That's why I added this suggestion. Approving lengthy ban abilities particularly to be used for extremely abusive players ultimately results in a much better gaming experience for all the other players that are reasonably following the rules. 

If the reason for shorter bans (besides abuse) is to get players back onto the server as soon as possible (and viewing ads to bring in funds to run/improve the server), it should be considered that the server would actually do better if cancerous players are removed at length (if not permanently), so the good players that are actually prospective donors can have a much better overall playing experience. Furthermore, according to Immanuel Kant's (a German philosopher) Categorical Imperative: it would be completely unethical to take money from cancerous players and creating a scenario where the ends justify the means.

Print this item

  TTT songs
Posted by: TrueCrimson - Yesterday, 01:13 AM - Forum: Server Suggestions - Replies (5)

So I could not find the thread to post song ideas for TTT so I made a suggestion. Saint was away and Zell was at work so I wanted to post this.

Mad World

Witch Doctor

I'm blue

Print this item

  I would like to become a member of LFG
Posted by: DolishPotato - 11-15-2017, 04:08 PM - Forum: Apply For Membership - Replies (5)

Steam ID STEAM_0:0:71958631


I would like to become a member of LFG, because I enjoy playing on the sandbox and deathrun servers and have a lot of play time on the sandbox one too. I would also like to help out with other things. Nobody, or maybe a few people like mic spammers, I could be there to mute them. So I would enjoy being a member of LFG.

Print this item