6-15-18, 04:49 PM
[LFG] Charlegmane gave him multiple warnings and he did not listen
staff donator
|
|||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|||||
|
|||||
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
|
|||||
6-15-18, 04:49 PM
[LFG] Charlegmane gave him multiple warnings and he did not listen
6-15-18, 05:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 6-15-18, 05:05 PM by M-E-T-A. Edited 1 time in total.)
(6-15-18, 04:49 PM)Box Wrote: [LFG] Charlegmane gave him multiple warnings and he did not listen no he didnt give me any warnings he just said delete your ramp even though it wasnt breaking any rules, so when i didnt delete it he did cos he is a brat the gets pissed when he doesnt get what he wants. and the ban i got was bs cos i didnt prop kill anyone when he banned me and the pgag was bs
6-15-18, 05:15 PM
(6-15-18, 05:04 PM)M-E-T-A Wrote: no he didnt give me any warnings he just said delete your ramp even though it wasnt breaking any rules, so when i didnt delete it he did cos he is a brat the gets pissed when he doesnt get what he wants. and the ban i got was bs cos i didnt prop kill anyone when he banned me and the pgag was bs That is because you didn't listen to me when I told you to remove it. Me removing it and telling you not to use it is proof enough. (6-15-18, 05:15 PM)TrueCrimson Wrote: That is because you didn't listen to me when I told you to remove it. Me removing it and telling you not to use it is proof enough. Because it wasnt breaking rules so stop being a complete retard and know you messed up and instead of defending yourself, fix it here is proof that it is a false ban char admits it. <15:44:29> "Lil Pump": char remove that false ban immediatly <15:44:48> "Charlemagne": okay i would if there was one <15:44:59> "Charlemagne": pwnzer is unbanned <15:45:00> "Lil Pump": there is it is for two days <15:45:07> "Charlemagne": yeah <15:45:09> "Charlemagne": and? <15:45:14> "Demonik1": penis as you can see char admits to it being false when he said yeah
6-15-18, 06:00 PM
(6-15-18, 05:24 PM)M-E-T-A Wrote: here is proof that it is a false ban char admits it. How is confirming that your ban is two days long admission of guilt?
6-15-18, 06:05 PM
(6-15-18, 06:00 PM)SaintLuther Wrote: How is confirming that your ban is two days long admission of guilt? <15:44:29> "Lil Pump": char remove that false ban immediatly
<15:44:48> "Charlemagne": okay i would if there was one <15:45:00> "Lil Pump": there is it is for two days <15:45:07> "Charlemagne": yeah there i deleted the ones that might be confusing . He agreed that it was a false ban when he said "yeah" to me saying that there was a false ban for two days and the only two day ban he could have been talking about was the false ban he did on me
6-15-18, 06:06 PM
No i talked to pwnzer and he was respectful about everything so i removed his 5 hour ban.
6-15-18, 06:09 PM
(6-15-18, 06:06 PM)TrueCrimson Wrote: No i talked to pwnzer and he was respectful about everything so i removed his 5 hour ban. Cool but how is this related to my ban?
6-15-18, 06:18 PM
(6-15-18, 06:05 PM)M-E-T-A Wrote: He agreed that it was a false ban when he said "yeah" to me saying that there was a false ban for two days No, he said yes because you said "there is it is for two days" which is terrible English and if someone doesn't try to reverse engineer it, it might sound like "is it for two days". Stop being retarded and make actual sentences.
6-15-18, 06:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 6-15-18, 06:22 PM by M-E-T-A. Edited 1 time in total.)
(6-15-18, 06:18 PM)SaintLuther Wrote: No, he said yes because you said "there is it is for two days" which is terrible English and if someone doesn't try to reverse engineer it, it might sound like "is it for two days". there is (meaning there is a false ban) it is for two day (meaning the false ban was for two days) yeah (meaning yes) There should be a comma in between is and it though |
|||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|