9-25-17, 05:12 PM
(9-24-17, 11:13 PM)SCMC Wrote: Since the majority wants the in-game requirement to change and the "Remove the in-game time requirement" options is winning there are 2 options on what to do (unless @SaintLuther wants to wait longer
(9-25-17, 10:52 AM)Zellogi Wrote: @SCMC Are you blind or do you just make up results for the poll?
(picture)
It looks like "Remove" and "Do nothing" are winning, with "Remove" having one vote over "Do nothing".
Im not sure if i didnt explain myself good enough for you to understand or if you failed at doing simple maths. First of all even if "Remove" has one more vote, its still the majority i mean 8 will always be more than 7 but that is only part of what i meant, when i said "Since the majority wants the in-game requirement to change and the "Remove the in-game time requirement" options is winning" i wasnt talking about the "remove" options only, i was also talking about the "reduce" options that got votes, meaning that when i said Majority i wasnt talking about the 1 vote difference between "dont change" and "remove", i was talking about the 4 vote difference between "dont change" and "reduce" together with "remove", wich means the majority wants the bounty system to change wich is why i suggested the 2 options i suggested.
(9-25-17, 10:07 AM)SaintLuther Wrote: Do we actually have people with less than 4 hours trying to place bounties? If so, where do they get the LFG Points from to do this?
The problem isnt waiting the 4 hours, the problem is not being able to put a bounty on someone who hasnt been on for 4 hours (at least for me)