[Upheld] silly and maum

[Vegio]

dude, stop replying on this thread, or make an argument if ur gonna, and about what you just said.. im the fccing one that banned him.
f at all they were both being shitheads to eachother and meta decided to start it first. so I banned meta cuz 1. i did not know that goose ws actually proppushing or not, 2. meta started being a little boy in the logs threatening goose about bans and then took it further instead of being mature, 3. they were both arguing and I saw no reports of proppush and the 2 votekicks that meta sent out were denied by the whole server as a whole so I banned him seeing that he was abusing his power as a member/donor. And the thing is, the whole damn server voted a yes with the voteban making me think meta has been being a cunt to everyone else. the argument about "ooh silly goose has friends and shit hurr durr" is denied severely by that fact. I am done. I cant think of a way @M-E-T-A could get past my argument here.

---

So please, come at me.

1. i did not know that goose ws actually proppushing or not,
WHAT DO YOU MEAN. So you banned cause you didnt believe that your dear friend could prop push. That is a baseless ban
2. meta started being a little boy in the logs threatening goose about bans and then took it further instead of being mature,
Did he ban though he was probably threatening to take it higher
3. they were both arguing and I saw no reports of proppush and the 2 votekicks that meta sent out were denied by the whole server as a whole so I banned him seeing that he was abusing his power as a member/donor.
You see two people arguing so you ban one of them smart move and just because they got denied doesn't mean abuse. You are the dumbest member I've seen.
You e2 abuse as well so I'm not to afraid to come at a rule breaker
From this alone you should get member revoked