6-20-15, 10:44 PM
(6-20-15, 10:00 PM)AlexTobyTeam Wrote: I might not be active on the servers that much anymore, but I am still relatively active on the forums.
For argument's sake, let's just say that Pierce IS really that bad. Does that mean legitimate reports he files have no merit? Possibly, if he reports everyone for the smallest, insignificant detail. But as far as I can tell, he hasn't. In this thread: http://lennyfacegaming.org/showthread.php?tid=379 Cactus says, and I quote, "zombie only broke rules that effected u to piss u off cuz u were mean to him. he didnt hurt anyone else (except maybe shovel)." Where do I start? How about with the fact that rule breaking is still rule breaking, no matter what reason you have, or what the other person did to you. Also, breaking rules to piss someone off when they were mean to you... how does that make anything better? If anything, it makes you look like a vengeful person who can't let anything go, exactly what some of you are telling Pierce not to be, despite being them yourselves. Not to mention that this... rule breaking potentially hurt another person who had nothing to do with anything. Also, is Pierce in the right to accuse Shovel of doing bath salts? Well, I don't entirely understand what this means, but I assume people can get high off of bath salts. I have never heard of this happening, I don't even know what bath salts are. But I heard on the news the other day that some person got high off of nutmeg, so I now believe that it is possible to get high off of anything. Anyway, back to my point. Because Pierce is (apparently) in the wrong for saying this, does that mean everyone against him is automatically in the right? Of course not. Purely black and white issues are rare in the real world, usually both sides contain some right and some wrong. Why am I talking about ethics here? We're all adults (or close enough) here, we shouldn't need a lecture on this sort of thing. It's what you tell a three year old. Moving on.
http://lennyfacegaming.org/showthread.php?tid=383 I don't even know what to say. Aside from, what the hell? Considering everything I've seen in the past few weeks, people are clearly not a fan of Pierce. Does this mean that they have a right to ruin 20+ hours of work he's done? Okay, let's assume that everything Pierce said was over exaggerated or made up (not saying it is, this is just for the sake of argument). Instead of handling the situation in any better way, Storm calls him "Jiggly 2.0," and Thick actually defends their actions. Then he apparently brags about having all of Pierce's stuff. Maybe it wasn't a brag, but why add that? It doesn't help your argument in the slightest. Then Storm makes a dick joke, says tat the entire ordeal was a joke, and to grow up and deal with his own shit. Let's break this down. First off, why is everyone obsessed with dick jokes on the internet? Moving on. I'm pretty sure that anyone will agree that banning someone as a joke is an abuse of power. Bans should not be thrown around that lightly, and should never be used against anyone who isn't breaking any major rules. Even if you count minor rules as ban-worthy, the closest thing Pierce did to breaking any rule would be arguing (justifiably, I might add) with an admin. And now onto the final part. By telling Pierce to deal with his own shit in this particular scenario, you are basically implying that it is Pierce's fault that you killed him. That's what you were trying to say, right? Or were you referring to when Pierce said that he has his own problems to deal with, in which case, THAT MAKES NO SENSE! Pierce was complaining about you killing him, and merely mentioned his personal problems. If he created an entire thread detailing everything wrong in his life, then this comment would be justified. But that isn't what pierce is doing here. He is talking about a community related problem, not a personal problem. Also, how do you know that he isn't "dealing with his own shit" at other times? How do you know he isn't trying to do that when he's not playing? GMod is not a place to solve problems, it's a place to temporarily get away from them for a break. That's the exact reason that I created http://lennyfacegaming.org/showthread.php?tid=256. Why does almost no one else seem to get this?
Well, that paragraph is big. But I'm not even close to done. Next, Pierce says how Storm made a suicide joke towards him. So what does Storm do? He defends it with, and I quote, "Hell yah I did, why does this shock anyone I probably say that more then Cactus complains.
Cactus, I know you are only trying to help the server grow by recruiting all of these people, and I don't know your exact methods, but you should play with these people at least two or three times before officially recruiting them (if you aren't already. If that's exactly what you're doing then ignore what I said to you).
Pierce and I are fine. So don't get offended by this. But to me, you have ignored all of Pierce's wrongs and highlighted all of our wrongs. First of all, YOU HAVE NO ROOM TO TALK, so I don't even know why you're writing this (yes u have the right, but the forum is 1/4 of what is significant. Second, I AM FUCKING TIRED OF BEING BLAMED FOR RECRUITING PEOPLE, I SHOULD BE FUCKING COMMENDED FOR THIS SHIT. I HAVE RECRUITED 9/10 OF THE 2 MOST RECENT PAGES. OUT OF ALL 1 WAS BAD, I HAVE EXPLAINED IPHONE'S SITUATION. BUT A FUCKING 5TH GRADER IS SMART ENOUGH TO KNOW, I AM NOT ONE TO FAULT. PEOPLE ASK ME "CAN I JOIN LFG?". WTF DO U WANT ME TO SAY, "FIRST I HAVE TO PLAY WITH YOU FOR AN HOUR". NO OMG. My method is getting people on the server for 4 hours or more (with no bans) to join. Or if they specifically ask. Second, I never fucking commended zombies for breaking the rules, but if an admin is being rude to you, the only way to fight back is to break the rules. Meaning that he was breaking the rules to fight someone who is being rude (the admin breaking the rule of DISRESPECT). IDGAF about anything else you wrote since it doesn't pertains to me or its so silly im not even gonna comment on it.