[Rejected] ACF

[westernspy]

uhhhhh

User has been warned 20% for this post. Reason: Spamming

[The Shingler]

(∩⩺ ³⩹)⊃━☆ﾟ.*

Piddazle, Pidoozle, Your Server Recommendation gets a nu from me!

Ok, There can be Glitches with ACF.
We had it before, But I don't know what's it like now.


Well, Sorry for the Downfall, But i think that this Add-on/Repository can be Abused, so it should not be Added.

...Like the Fortnight Swep.....

[westernspy]

oh, okay.

---

Wait a sec I’m gonna edit the thread of it has to be restricted to member and up

[Lt.Pwnzer123]

(∩⩺ ³⩹)⊃━☆ﾟ.*

Piddazle, Pidoozle, Your Server Recommendation gets a nu from me!

Ok, There can be Glitches with ACF.
We had it before, But I don't know what's it like now.


Well, Sorry for the Downfall, But i think that this Add-on/Repository can be Abused, so it should not be Added.

...Like the Fortnight Swep.....

Oh my actual fucking god

He's at furry status

Can we ban him yet before he gets even worse?

[westernspy]

Oh well, this addon might not be added.

User has been warned 20% for this post. Reason: Spamming

[marchkarcz]

Imo it should be added due to the amount of players who use it. I'm pretty sure LFG would get a lot more players by adding it and I know I would join more if it was added for donator+. You can remove guns from the source code if you want. That's why open source software is great.

And, you can have acf modes (build or battle) that could be changed by admins.

[child beater 9k]

This thread has tanked completely by this point. I'll figure out a system where ACF can be implemented into SBox without causing too much aids, and I'll make the idea actually presentable.

[marchkarcz]

Sounds good. I know though that adding harder to use addons will begin to possibly get more mature players on the server, which I notice is an issue. Not saying I'm the most mature person out there or anything, but I do notice how immature the majority of the community is, no offense.

ACF would be a great addition especially if it was implemented in a way that it couldn't be abused, such as adding an ACF prop protection (which does exist, and is seperate from Falcos)