staff donator

[Box]

[LFG] Charlegmane gave him multiple warnings and he did not listen

[M-E-T-A]

[LFG] Charlegmane gave him multiple warnings and he did not listen

no he didnt give me any warnings he just said delete your ramp even though it wasnt breaking any rules, so when i didnt delete it he did cos he is a brat the gets pissed when he doesnt get what he wants. and the ban i got was bs cos i didnt prop kill anyone when he banned me and the pgag was bs

[TrueCrimson]

no he didnt give me any warnings he just said delete your ramp even though it wasnt breaking any rules, so when i didnt delete it he did cos he is a brat the gets pissed when he doesnt get what he wants. and the ban i got was bs cos i didnt prop kill anyone when he banned me and the pgag was bs

That is because you didn't listen to me when I told you to remove it. Me removing it and telling you not to use it is proof enough.

[M-E-T-A]

That is because you didn't listen to me when I told you to remove it. Me removing it and telling you not to use it is proof enough.

Because it wasnt breaking rules so stop being a complete retard and know you messed up and instead of defending yourself, fix it

---

here is proof that it is a false ban char admits it. 
<15:44:29> "Lil Pump": char remove that false ban immediatly
<15:44:48> "Charlemagne": okay i would if there was one
<15:44:59> "Charlemagne": pwnzer is unbanned
<15:45:00> "Lil Pump": there is it is for two days
<15:45:07> "Charlemagne": yeah
<15:45:09> "Charlemagne": and?
<15:45:14> "Demonik1": penis

as you can see char admits to it being false when he said yeah

[SaintLuther]

here is proof that it is a false ban char admits it.
<15:44:29> "Lil Pump": char remove that false ban immediatly
<15:44:48> "Charlemagne": okay i would if there was one
<15:44:59> "Charlemagne": pwnzer is unbanned
<15:45:00> "Lil Pump": there is it is for two days
<15:45:07> "Charlemagne": yeah
<15:45:09> "Charlemagne": and?
<15:45:14> "Demonik1": penis

as you can see char admits to it being false when he said yeah

How is confirming that your ban is two days long admission of guilt?

[M-E-T-A]

How is confirming that your ban is two days long admission of guilt?

<15:44:29> "Lil Pump": char remove that false ban immediatly
<15:44:48> "Charlemagne": okay i would if there was one
<15:45:00> "Lil Pump": there is it is for two days
<15:45:07> "Charlemagne": yeah

there i deleted the ones that might be confusing . He agreed that it was a false ban when he said "yeah" to me saying that there was a false ban for two days and the only two day ban he could have been talking about was the false ban he did on me

[TrueCrimson]

No i talked to pwnzer and he was respectful about everything so i removed his 5 hour ban.

[M-E-T-A]

No i talked to pwnzer and he was respectful about everything so i removed his 5 hour ban.

Cool but how is this related to my ban?

[SaintLuther]

He agreed that it was a false ban when he said "yeah" to me saying that there was a false ban for two days

No, he said yes because you said "there is it is for two days" which is terrible English and if someone doesn't try to reverse engineer it, it might sound like "is it for two days".

Stop being retarded and make actual sentences.

[M-E-T-A]

No, he said yes because you said "there is it is for two days" which is terrible English and if someone doesn't try to reverse engineer it, it might sound like  "is it for two days".

Stop being retarded and make actual sentences.

there is (meaning there is a false ban) it is for two day (meaning the false ban was for two days)
yeah (meaning yes)

There should be a comma in between is and it though