7-11-18, 07:55 PM
(7-11-18, 04:42 PM)Lt.Pwnzer123 Wrote: 1. I feel like Charlemagne, or @TrueCrimson, is never actually on when there's serious rule breakers. That's handled by members, or other admin. I can't prove that he's using something such as neutron to determine whether anyone's breaking rules and whether or not he's using that data to make sure to avoid it, but I can certainly say I have never actually seen him deal with anything above micspam or chatspam.
2. He's extremely disrespectful to many others but as soon as anybody insults him slightly, he gets extremely angry and starts telling them to stop arguing and disrespecting admins. Let me just say here, neither in Sandbox, Prophunt, or TTT there are any rules against admin disrespect, just arguing with admins, and he twists that much that simply having an opinion that he does not share may result in a mute, or permamute if he has "warned you" enough times. I do have to commend you for having no rule against admin disrespect @SaintLuther, people really only should have respect if they can earn it.
3. Charlemagne seems to think he's being "forced" to be an admin when people tell him they don't like how he admins. The only real thing that he does is join to ruin the fun, yet he has a "Holier-than-thou, Mightier-than-though, Better-than-thou" attitude. I've only seen him act like he's an equal with some admins and @SaintLuther, as well as the consultant and most likely the advisors I imagine.
Those are my main reasons, as well as the fact that he's extremely prejudiced against me and some others, waving a power wand like pmuting me for a minute as some sort of threat.
Now im going to explain why Pwnzers arguments are pretty much pointless or dumb. I highlighted some key phrases that will pretty much help explaining
1. First of all the fuck are you complaining about? how do you expect him to deal with rule breakers when he is not even on the server. You dont see me complaining at (for example) @UHC for not dealing with a rule breaker when he isnt even on the server, because the would be unfair and illogical.
You said he deals with micspam or chatspam, you are basically saying he is doing his job, you might not have seen him dealing with "anything above micspam or chatspam" but you still said you have seen him dealing with micspam or chatspam which means he is doing his job, which makes the argument pointless.
2. Well if you start insulting him what do you expect? do you think he will say "thank you"? of course he is going to disrespect you if you start disrespecting him. When someone tells you something like "kill yourself you stupid nigger" do you reply something like "thank you, yes im a stupid nigger"?. Also i want to point out that if you are disrespecting him and he tells you to stop but you dont stop, thats arguing with an admin.
3. Lets talk about irony, you are being prejudiced against him too, since he dosent act like he is superior with everyone but admins and people with a higher rank, i have seen him act normally with guests and members as well.
Spoiler: