[LFG]VietnamHusky Abuse

[juan the panda]

Which Server: Zombie Survival
Your Steam ID:STEAM_0:0:60148353
Your Steam Name: Juan the Panda
Their Steam ID:STEAM_0:0:80529159
Their Steam Name:[LFG]VietnamHusky

Description of offense and evidence (screen shots, logs, etc.):
 He came on the server when there were more than 30 people and more zombies then humans (keep in mind it was last round) . He then proceeded to create a vote to force boss everyone and since zombies outnumbered the humans the vote won. He then forced bossed everyone and ruined any chance of the humans winning the game. He essential broke the game. This is clear abuse and unnecessary it ruined the game by giving the zombies an unfair advantage. 


Photos
Him creating the vote
http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.co...C3CC99E7D/

Him using the command to force boss everyone
http://images.akamai.steamusercontent.co...1874FCD18/

[SaintLuther]

The first screenshot is a votemap, and the second one shows that people voted "yes" to a mass forceboss.

[juan the panda]

The first screenshot is a votemap, and the second one shows that people voted "yes" to a mass forceboss.

look in the chat box for the first one it says "[LFG]VietnamHusky started a vote (forceboss all?)"

and like i said zombies out numbered the humans so it was unfair to force boss

[WTF-GamerZ]

How many of the 16 people that voted picked "No"? Just gotta tell the others to vote No or tell the admin that you don't want to be forcedboss.

@SaintLuther maybe make it a rule that if admin does vote to do a forceboss only they can only use the command on the people that voted for "Yes" if it passes (leaving the ones who did not vote and voted for "No" to not use that command on)

[SaintLuther]

@SaintLuther maybe make it a rule that if admin does vote to do a forceboss only they can only use the command on the people that voted for "Yes" if it passes (leaving the ones who did not vote  and voted for "No" to not use that command on)

What zombie would not want to be a boss?

[Dogesky]

Juan, To me it doesn't matter that zombies outnumbered humans, as of the time the vote passed, there were 15 humans and 22 zombies (two people connected by the time of the second picture.)

My policy on forceboss is that if more people vote yes then there are humans alive, then the vote is valid to pass.

There were 1 more votes for "Yes" then there were humans in this case.

[WTF-GamerZ]

What zombie would not want to be a boss?

Maybe the people that voted for "No" or the remaining people that don't wan't to go against the team of bosses (who knows? ) haha

[Zellogi]

It's not abuse if majority agreed to it. That's called democracy.

[Pushmeme]

As a cancerous player who should just stop, I looked at the images and saw that husky started the forceboss at the beginning at wave 6 not near the end, so I can sort of see where Juan is going at this.

[juan the panda]

Juan, To me it doesn't matter that zombies outnumbered humans, as of the time the vote passed, there were 15 humans and 22 zombies (two people connected by the time of the second picture.)

My policy on forceboss is that if more people vote yes then there are humans alive, then the vote is valid to pass.

There were 1 more votes for "Yes" then there were humans in this case.

you cant just do a vote like that that breaks game play when there is a considerate amount of people playing seriously.

---

It's not abuse if majority agreed to it. That's called democracy.

 this is a game breaking command, its meant for fun when there are less people or (for example) there are 3 zombies having a hard time. its not meant for 30+ players that are playing seriously . plus there were more zombies so that means the vote will pass because the zombies want to win and they will outnumber the votes of the humans. The zombies have an invested intrest to vote yes