Another suggestion to help stop these false votebans

[TrueCrimson]

I like this idea... (dont forget operators though.)

You know this is prob only for sandbox right? Apparently TTT abuse too much.

[SaintLuther]

We could give admins the power to veto and
Members the power to over ride the admins veto with 2/3 of the servers approval

And then after the Members pass the veto veto, the admins can vote to veto the veto veto, and if that passes, the guests have to vote to veto the veto veto veto

[child beater 9k]

what the fuck

User has been warned 20% for this post. Reason: Spamming

[SCMC]

And then after the Members pass the veto veto, the admins can vote to veto the veto veto, and if that passes, the guests have to vote to veto the veto veto veto

But what if members dont want to pass the veto veto so admins can vote to veto the veto veto and let the guests have to vote to veto to vote the veto veto veto to vote the vote to veto veto veto veto veto veto to vote another veto veto to vote the veto veto

[child beater 9k]

But what if members dont want to pass the veto veto so admins can vote to veto the veto veto and let the guests have to vote to veto to vote the veto veto veto to vote the vote to veto veto veto veto veto veto to vote another veto veto to vote the veto veto

Stop

[Dark Swordsman]

You know this is prob only for sandbox right? Apparently TTT abuse too much.

No its not that. But it happens, so instead of repeating it later, let's deal with it now and make it a gmod update thing.

[Dogesky]

We could give admins the power to veto and
Members the power to over ride the admins veto with 2/3 of the servers approval

someone has been taking us history class seriously

@SaintLuther vetoing should just stop at the 2/3 veto if Phil's idea is implemented, although his idea is a little inconvenient

[Demonik1]

there is actually a stopvote command

Oh well admins don't have access to that either so that could be what I'm looking for

[TrueCrimson]

Wouldn't veto be the same as stop vote basically? one if during and one is at the end. The only compromise would be if an admin was on he would have the approve the reasoning but again that would just go back to arguing.

[Phil]

And then after the Members pass the veto veto, the admins can vote to veto the veto veto, and if that passes, the guests have to vote to veto the veto veto veto

No like if the admin vetos the vote and the members over ride the veto it stays vetoed until the next map change