8-7-18, 06:09 PM
I thought about this and visited some other servers, I think this would be a neat opportunity to encourage some E2 creativity and might spice up combat a little.
What I'm intending to propose is that we allow the use of Expression2 in combat under the circumstance that it is balanced and has counters. Eg: a user could have an e2 vehicle, but can be destroyed if it takes to much damage. Of course admins could easily determine if it fits the line off fair or not. We'll only have to see the potential outcomes.
What we could to: is change:
*Do not use PAC3 or E2 to gain an advantage in combat in any way possible.
to:
*Do not use pac3 to gain an advantage in combat (E2 Exempt)
- Expression2 used in combat must be deemed fair by administration or have obvious counters.
What I'm intending to propose is that we allow the use of Expression2 in combat under the circumstance that it is balanced and has counters. Eg: a user could have an e2 vehicle, but can be destroyed if it takes to much damage. Of course admins could easily determine if it fits the line off fair or not. We'll only have to see the potential outcomes.
What we could to: is change:
*Do not use PAC3 or E2 to gain an advantage in combat in any way possible.
to:
*Do not use pac3 to gain an advantage in combat (E2 Exempt)
- Expression2 used in combat must be deemed fair by administration or have obvious counters.
"Leaders become great, not because of their power, but because of their ability to empower others." -John Maxwell